1. The article is a collection of Instagram posts from various users, including filmifresh, divyenndu, and vashu3504.
2. The post discusses an ongoing issue that the author is frustrated with, but does not provide specific details about the issue.
3. Another user named ft.aman_09 comments on the post, expressing their disappointment with the relatability of the content.
The above article appears to be a collection of Instagram posts and comments, rather than a traditional article with coherent content. It is difficult to provide a detailed critical analysis of the article based on its content because it lacks any substantial information or argument.
However, there are several issues with the article that can be pointed out. Firstly, the sources provided for the Instagram posts are not reliable or credible. They are simply links to Instagram profiles and images, which do not provide any context or verifiable information.
Secondly, the article seems to lack any clear purpose or thesis. It is unclear what point the author is trying to make or what information they are trying to convey. This lack of focus makes it difficult to assess any potential biases or one-sided reporting.
Additionally, there is no evidence provided for any claims made in the article. The text consists mainly of links and references to Instagram posts, without any supporting evidence or analysis. This lack of evidence undermines the credibility of the article and raises questions about its reliability.
Furthermore, there are no counterarguments presented in the article. It only includes one-sided comments and opinions without considering alternative perspectives or addressing potential criticisms. This lack of balance further suggests a biased approach.
The article also contains promotional content in the form of links to various Instagram profiles and posts. This raises concerns about whether the article is intended as genuine analysis or simply as a means of promoting certain individuals or accounts on Instagram.
Overall, this article lacks coherence, reliable sources, evidence for claims made, balanced reporting, and clear purpose. It does not provide a meaningful analysis of any topic and raises doubts about its credibility and objectivity.