1. The internet is considered a vital resource today, with very few things that cannot be done online.
2. The use of the internet is becoming more widespread with every passing day, and smartphones are expected to overtake computers as the most widely used technological tool on a global scale.
3. If Google were to collapse permanently or indefinitely, people would not be able to look for any information and several companies and organizations would be affected.
The article "What Would Happen If Google Suddenly Stopped Working?" raises an interesting question about the importance of the internet and Google in our daily lives. However, the article lacks depth and critical analysis.
The article starts by asking readers to imagine a world without Google, but it fails to provide any evidence or data to support its claims. The author assumes that everyone relies on Google for everything, which is not entirely true. While Google is undoubtedly a popular search engine, there are other alternatives available such as Bing, Yahoo, and DuckDuckGo.
Moreover, the article overlooks the fact that people have been living without the internet for centuries. While it may be challenging to imagine life without instant access to information and communication tools, it is not impossible. The author also fails to consider how people would adapt if Google were to shut down permanently.
The article also makes unsupported claims about the younger generation's preference for online relationships over face-to-face interactions. While it is true that social media has changed how people interact with each other, it does not necessarily mean that online relationships are more important than real-life ones.
Furthermore, the article seems biased towards technology and its benefits while ignoring its potential risks. It fails to explore counterarguments or present both sides equally. For example, while smartphones may offer many advantages, they can also be addictive and harmful to mental health.
In conclusion, while the article raises an interesting question about the importance of Google in our lives, it lacks critical analysis and depth. It presents one-sided reporting and unsupported claims while overlooking essential points of consideration. The author's bias towards technology and its benefits also undermines the credibility of the article.