Full Picture

Article analysis:

The article titled "The Use of Online and Offline Video in English Listening Comprehension Assessment: Students' Perception" presents a qualitative study on the perception of university students regarding the use of online and offline videos in assessing their English listening comprehension. The study involved 35 students as respondents, who were given a questionnaire and an interview to gather data on their experiences with learning and assessment media.

The article provides valuable insights into the benefits of using OOV for assessing listening comprehension, including the ability to learn communicative English from native speakers, enriching vocabulary and expressions, learning ESL culture, providing setting visualization, offering interesting assessment materials such as movies, songs, and news. The study also highlights differences between online and offline videos in terms of efficiency, flexibility, real-time feedback, and technical issues.

However, the article has some potential biases that need to be considered. Firstly, the study only involved one university in Indonesia which limits its generalizability to other contexts. Secondly, the sample size is relatively small which may affect the representativeness of the findings. Thirdly, there is no discussion on how the participants were selected or recruited which raises questions about sampling bias.

Moreover, some claims made in the article are unsupported by evidence or missing points of consideration. For example, while it is claimed that authentic materials present English culture and enhance listening skills more effectively than teacher-made materials without any evidence to support this claim. Additionally, there is no discussion on how OOV can be used to assess higher-order listening skills such as inference-making or critical thinking.

Furthermore, there are unexplored counterarguments that could challenge some of the claims made in the article. For instance, while it is claimed that OOV can provide real-time feedback and scores after finishing assessments without discussing potential risks associated with relying solely on technology for assessment purposes.

In conclusion, while "The Use of Online and Offline Video in English Listening Comprehension Assessment: Students' Perception" provides valuable insights into the benefits of using OOV for assessing listening comprehension, it has some potential biases and unsupported claims that need to be considered. Future research should address these limitations and explore the effectiveness of OOV in assessing higher-order listening skills.