The article discusses the impact of ChatGPT on education and how to train children to meet its challenges. However, it lacks critical analysis and presents some potential biases.
Firstly, the article seems to promote a fear of artificial intelligence and its potential negative impact on education. The curator of the Shanghai Science and Technology Museum predicts that AI will eventually detect and collect life, which is an extreme view without any evidence or scientific basis. This fear-mongering approach may not be helpful in promoting a balanced discussion about AI's role in education.
Secondly, the article suggests that ChatGPT can replace many human skills, such as translation, legal services, programming, and design ideas. While it is true that AI can perform some tasks better than humans, it cannot replace human creativity, empathy, and critical thinking skills. Therefore, it is essential to emphasize the importance of developing these skills in children rather than focusing solely on specific knowledge learning.
Thirdly, the article proposes several solutions for training children to meet the challenges of ChatGPT but does not provide sufficient evidence or examples to support them. For instance, it suggests promoting more diverse learning without explaining how this can be achieved or what benefits it may bring.
Fourthly, the article focuses mainly on the positive aspects of educational equipment without exploring potential risks or downsides. For example, it emphasizes using big concepts to enhance educational realms but does not consider how this may lead to oversimplification or neglecting important details.
Overall, while the article raises some valid points about AI's impact on education and the need for training children with essential skills for the future workforce, it lacks critical analysis and evidence-based arguments. It also promotes a biased view of AI as a threat rather than an opportunity for education.