1. There is no evidence that the death penalty deters crime.
2. The death penalty is costly and controversial, and has been abolished in many countries around the world.
3. Resources used for the death penalty could be better spent on strategies known to reduce crime, such as hiring and training police officers.
The article provides a comprehensive overview of the debate surrounding the death penalty, including its costliness, controversy, and lack of evidence that it deters crime. The author presents both sides of the argument fairly and objectively, providing evidence to support their claims while also noting potential risks associated with capital punishment regimes. They also explore counterarguments to their own position, such as the idea that capital punishment may have a brutalizing effect on society or that it could lead to fewer killings due to its severity compared to other penalties.
The article does not appear to be biased or one-sided in any way; instead, it presents both sides of the argument fairly and objectively. It also does not contain any promotional content or partiality towards either side of the debate. Furthermore, all claims made are supported by evidence from reliable sources such as studies conducted by the National Academy of Sciences and econometric research.
In conclusion, this article is trustworthy and reliable in its presentation of both sides of the debate surrounding capital punishment. It provides an objective overview of the issue without bias or partiality towards either side while also supporting all claims made with evidence from reliable sources.