Full Picture

Extension usage examples:

Here's how our browser extension sees the article:
Appears strongly imbalanced

Article summary:

1. The book "Functional and Logical Programming" by G. M. Sergievsky and N. G. Volchenkov is a comprehensive resource on the subject, with interesting sections on optimizing functional programs and their verification.

2. The book "Programming in Erlang" by C. Thompson and F. Cesarini is a useful resource for those learning the language, covering topics from the basics to distributed programming, OTP, and using the Mnesia database.

3. The manual "SWI Prolog, Turbo Prolog, Visual Prolog" provides an overview of popular prologue dialects as well as instructions for developing programs with a graphical interface in Visual Prolog and SWI Prolog (XPCE).

Article analysis:

The article provides an overview of two books related to functional and logical programming: “Functional and Logical Programming” by G. M. Sergievsky and N. G. Volchenkov, and “Programming in Erlang” by C. Thompson and F. Cesarini, as well as a manual on SWI Prolog, Turbo Prolog, Visual Prolog (XPCE). The author's opinion of these resources is generally positive; however there are some potential biases that should be noted when considering the trustworthiness of this article:

1) The author does not provide any evidence or sources to support their claims about the quality of these books; they simply state that they are “very interesting” or “not bad” without providing any further details or analysis to back up these assertions.

2) The author does not explore any counterarguments or alternative perspectives on these books; instead they simply present their own opinion without considering other points of view or possible risks associated with using them for learning purposes (e.g., difficulty level).

3) The article appears to be promotional in nature; it focuses solely on praising the books rather than providing an objective assessment of their strengths and weaknesses or exploring potential drawbacks associated with them (e.g., outdated information).

In conclusion, while this article may provide some useful information about two books related to functional and logical programming, its trustworthiness should be taken with a grain of salt due to its lack of evidence-based claims, one-sided reporting, promotional content, partiality towards certain resources over others, etc