Full Picture

Article analysis:

The article is generally reliable and trustworthy as it provides detailed evidence for its claims through a combination of secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) zircon UPb ages and O isotopes, laser ablation multicollector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-MC-ICPMS) zircon LuHf isotopes, whole-rock major-trace elements and SrNd isotopes data from Early Paleozoic mafic igneous rocks in the Tongbai orogen, Central China. The article also provides model calculations which confirm that its geochemical interpretations are valid.

However, there are some potential biases which should be noted when considering this article's trustworthiness and reliability. Firstly, there is no discussion or exploration of any counterarguments or alternative explanations for its findings; this could lead to an overly one sided view being presented in the article which may not accurately reflect reality. Secondly, there is no mention or discussion of any possible risks associated with recycling paleo-oceanic crust; this could lead to readers underestimating any potential dangers associated with such activities. Finally, while there is evidence provided for its claims made throughout the article, it does not provide enough detail or explanation for each piece of evidence presented; this could lead to readers not fully understanding how each piece fits into the overall argument being made by the authors.