Extension usage examples:
Here's how our browser extension sees the article:
Research and development issues in CO2 capture - ScienceDirect
Source: sciencedirect.com
Article summary:
1. This article reviews the current technologies for CO2 capture and identifies their limitations.
2. The article suggests directions for future research and development to improve capture rates, raise capture efficiencies, and lower capture costs.
3. The article references nine sources to support its claims.
Article analysis:
This article is generally reliable and trustworthy in its reporting of research and development issues in CO2 capture. It provides a comprehensive overview of the current technologies for CO2 capture, as well as their limitations, and suggests directions for future research and development. The article is well-referenced with nine sources that are cited throughout the text to support its claims.
The article does not appear to be biased or one-sided in its reporting, nor does it contain any promotional content or partiality towards any particular technology or approach. All potential risks associated with the various technologies are noted, and both sides of the argument are presented equally.
The only potential issue with this article is that it does not explore any counterarguments or missing points of consideration that may exist regarding the various technologies discussed. However, given that this is a summary review of existing literature on the topic rather than an original research paper, this is understandable and should not detract from the overall trustworthiness of the article.