1. Bibliometric analysis reveals influential literature on urban resilience.
2. Existing definitions of urban resilience are inconsistent and underdeveloped.
3. A new, inclusive definition of urban resilience is proposed to advance the field.
The article provides a comprehensive review of the scholarly literature on urban resilience and offers a new definition for the concept that takes into account six conceptual tensions fundamental to urban resilience. The article is well-researched and provides an in-depth analysis of existing definitions and their shortcomings, as well as a thorough discussion of the six conceptual tensions identified. The article also includes bibliometric analysis to identify influential literature on urban resilience, which adds credibility to its claims.
The article does not appear to be biased or one-sided in its reporting, as it presents both sides of the argument fairly and objectively. It also does not contain any promotional content or partiality towards any particular viewpoint or opinion. Furthermore, all possible risks associated with implementing this new definition are noted throughout the article, ensuring that readers are aware of potential issues before making decisions based on the information provided in the article.
In conclusion, this article is reliable and trustworthy due to its comprehensive research and objective reporting style.