Full Picture

Article analysis:

The article is generally reliable and trustworthy, providing a comprehensive overview of the exploitative and precarious nature of work in the digital game industry, as well as how developers respond to unstable working conditions. The author provides evidence for their claims by citing research from other authors such as Pongratz and Voß, Haunschild and Eikhof, Bergvall-Kåreborn and Howcroft, Zackariasson et al., Euromonitor, Skillset, BBC News, Parkeret al., Keynote, Prato et al., which adds credibility to their argument. Furthermore, they provide examples of self-exploitation that are fuelled by a passion for work in order to illustrate the consequences for developers.

The only potential bias that could be identified is that the author does not explore any counterarguments or present both sides equally; however this is understandable given that it is an academic article rather than a news piece or opinion piece. There are no unsupported claims or missing points of consideration; all relevant information has been included in order to provide a comprehensive overview of the topic at hand. Additionally there is no promotional content or partiality present in the article; it is purely factual information presented objectively without any bias towards one side or another. Finally, possible risks are noted throughout the article with regards to self-exploitation due to entrepreneurial practices leading to long working hours and unpaid work.