Full Picture

Article analysis:

The article is generally reliable and trustworthy, as it provides a detailed overview of the use of residual statics analysis as a general linear inverse problem in geophysics. The author cites 162 citations from other sources to support their claims, which adds to the trustworthiness of the article. Additionally, the author provides an extensive list of references at the end of the article for further reading on related topics.

However, there are some potential biases present in the article that should be noted. For example, while the author does provide an overview of how computer extraction of processing parameters such as stacking velocity and statics can be used to solve equations and find inverses, they do not explore any counterarguments or alternative methods for doing so. Additionally, while they cite 162 citations from other sources to support their claims, they do not provide any evidence for these claims or explain why these sources are reliable or trustworthy. Furthermore, while they provide an extensive list of references at the end of the article for further reading on related topics, they do not provide any additional information about these sources or explain why they are relevant to this topic.

In conclusion, while this article is generally reliable and trustworthy due to its extensive citations and references from other sources, there are some potential biases present that should be noted when evaluating its trustworthiness and reliability.