Full Picture

Article analysis:

The article provides an overview of the long-standing feud between Pink Floyd members Roger Waters and David Gilmour. The article is generally reliable in its reporting of the facts surrounding the dispute, such as when Waters attempted to dissolve the band in court and their reunion for Live 8. However, there are some potential biases present in the article which should be noted. For example, while it does mention that Waters initially wanted to dissolve the band due to “commercial restraints”, it does not explore any other possible motivations or reasons behind his decision. Additionally, while it does mention that Gilmour opposed Waters’ claims that Pink Floyd could not continue without him, it does not provide any evidence or further details on why he felt this way or what his arguments were. Furthermore, while the article does note that Waters has been critical of Gilmour’s wife Polly Samson’s use of Pink Floyd’s social media channels to promote her novels, it fails to provide any counterarguments from either side or explore any other perspectives on this issue. Finally, while the article does provide some insight into why a reunion tour may be unlikely at this point in time, it fails to explore any potential solutions or compromises which could be made by both parties in order to make a tour possible. In conclusion, while this article provides an accurate overview of the feud between Roger Waters and David Gilmour and is generally reliable in its reporting of facts related to their dispute, there are some potential biases present which should be noted when considering its trustworthiness and reliability.