Full Picture

Extension usage examples:

Here's how our browser extension sees the article:
May be slightly imbalanced

Article summary:

1. The article proposes a new dissimilarity index for measuring time series proximity, which takes into account both the closeness of values and the similarity in terms of growth behavior.

2. A comparative numerical analysis is performed between the proposed index and classical distance measures on two datasets: a synthetic dataset and a dataset from a public health study.

3. The article references 884 Accesses, 78 Citations, and 3 Altmetric metrics to support its findings.

Article analysis:

The article appears to be reliable and trustworthy as it provides evidence to support its claims through numerical analysis on two datasets, referencing 884 Accesses, 78 Citations, and 3 Altmetric metrics. Furthermore, the article references several other sources to back up its findings such as Alt H & Godau M (1992), Caiado J et al (2006), Chouakria Douzal A (2003), Eiter T & Mannila H (1994), Garcia-Escudero LA & Gordaliza A (2005), Godau M (1991), Heckman NE & Zamar RH (2000), Hennig C & Hausdorf B (2006), Kakizawa Y et al (1998), Kaslow RA & Ostrow DG (1987) and Keller K & Wittfeld K (2004).

The only potential bias that could be identified in this article is that it does not present both sides equally; however, this is not necessarily an issue since the purpose of the article is to propose a new dissimilarity index for measuring time series proximity rather than presenting both sides of an argument.