Full Picture

Article analysis:

The article is generally reliable and trustworthy, as it is based on a study conducted by qualified researchers and published in a reputable journal. The authors have provided evidence to support their claims, such as survey results from participants in the program and interviews with staff members at the recovery center. Furthermore, they have discussed potential limitations of their study, such as the small sample size and lack of control group.

However, there are some areas where the article could be improved upon. For example, it does not discuss any possible risks associated with therapeutic gardening programs or explore any counterarguments to its findings. Additionally, it does not provide any information about how long-term effects of the program were measured or what other interventions may have been used alongside it. Finally, while the authors do mention that further research is needed to confirm their findings, they do not provide any suggestions for future studies or directions for further exploration into this topic.