Full Picture

Extension usage examples:

Here's how our browser extension sees the article:
May be slightly imbalanced

Article summary:

1. A Chinese hacker organization called 'Xiao Qi-ying' has hacked a total of 2,000 websites and hinted at continuing the attack by leaving a message on the Telegram channel saying "Start Work".

2. The hacking level is not high, so the influence will be insignificant.

3. Security experts believe that the impact or damage from future attacks will not be large.

Article analysis:

This article provides an overview of the recent cyberattacks carried out by a Chinese hacker organization known as ‘Xiao Qi-ying’. It outlines the details of their attacks, including which websites were targeted and what messages were left behind on those sites. The article also discusses the security industry’s assessment of the group’s hacking level and its potential impact.

The article appears to be reliable in terms of its facts and information presented, as it cites sources such as Korea Internet & Security Agency (KISA) and security experts from Seoul Women's University and East Security. However, there are some potential biases in this article that should be noted. For example, while it does mention that Xiao Qi-ying has not tried ransomware yet, it does not explore any possible risks associated with this type of attack or discuss any counterarguments to this statement. Additionally, while it does provide quotes from security experts about their assessment of Xiao Qi-ying’s hacking level, it does not present both sides equally; instead, it focuses more on emphasizing that their influence will be insignificant rather than exploring other possibilities or implications for future attacks. Finally, there is no mention of any promotional content in this article; however, given its focus on highlighting Xiao Qi-ying’s lack of sophistication in comparison to other hackers, one could argue that this could be seen as a form of promotion for them since they are being portrayed as less dangerous than other groups.

In conclusion, while this article appears to be reliable in terms of its facts and information presented, there are some potential biases that should be noted when evaluating its trustworthiness and reliability.